home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
kermit.columbia.edu
/
kermit.columbia.edu.tar
/
kermit.columbia.edu
/
newsgroups
/
misc.20041116-20060924
/
000267_scottac@nb.sympatico.ca_Fri Mar 10 16:32:41 2006.msg
< prev
next >
Wrap
Internet Message Format
|
2006-09-27
|
3KB
Path: newsmaster.cc.columbia.edu!newsfeed.nyu.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!wn11feed!worldnet.att.net!207.35.177.252!nf3.bellglobal.com!ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca!53ab2750!not-for-mail
From: "Scott Caissie" <scottac@nb.sympatico.ca>
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.kermit.misc
References: <uGRPf.40748$VV4.591414@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca> <kLSPf.9392$X.1010@news-wrt-01.rdc-nyc.rr.com> <slrne10fck.8bc.fdc@sesame.cc.columbia.edu> <RqZPf.40942$VV4.594211@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca> <slrne10uul.jul.fdc@sesame.cc.columbia.edu> <H81Qf.41050$VV4.597519@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca> <ok2Qf.12766$nB6.1669@news-wrt-01.rdc-nyc.rr.com>
Subject: Re: closing a macro completely upon connect
Lines: 38
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
Message-ID: <aQkQf.41491$VV4.608841@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 19:54:46 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 156.34.15.45
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aliant.net
X-Trace: ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca 1142020486 156.34.15.45 (Fri, 10 Mar 2006 15:54:46 AST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 15:54:46 AST
Organization: Aliant Internet
Xref: newsmaster.cc.columbia.edu comp.protocols.kermit.misc:15519
But I still need to know what is being fixed.
Fix basically states that macros can be run from the Terminal without the
screen changing.
But normally, no complex macros can run (with or without set key) while
actively in the Terminal. They basically pause until you go back into the
Command window.
Can we have things running in the background now while in the Terminal?
Thats what it sounds like. Though as far as I know, only 1 macro can run at
a time. Invoking a macro in the Terminal while another macro (in a loop) is
running in the background will cause the one in the background to stop would
it not?
"Jeffrey Altman" <jaltman2@nyc.rr.com> wrote in message
news:ok2Qf.12766$nB6.1669@news-wrt-01.rdc-nyc.rr.com...
> Scott Caissie wrote:
>> just a little correction to prevent any misunderstanding. When I was
>> saying
>> "Normally all bug fixes are free. Enhancements cost. This unique
>> situation
>> would involve us paying this company to pay (you guys) for the fix. And
>> they
>> are already behind on a lot of bug fixes of their own." I was referring
>> to
>> the company we are leasing from rather than yourselves.
>
> Personally I'm not sure what difference the company in the middle makes.
> I have no relationship with Columbia, the middle man or you. By the
> terms of Columbia's license, I am allowed to provide a fix to any
> organization that is permitted to run the software. You either have a
> license to run the software or you don't.
>
> You can obtain the fix and I will brand the software to exactly the
> same license that the current version you are using is branded to.
>
> Jeffrey Altman